No. Financial capacity does not remove the applicable immigration requirements.
Identify the substantive gaps
Review the actual classification, process and individual questions. Do not assume a payment arrangement guarantees vetting, admissibility or visa availability.
Criminal history, prior immigration violations, misrepresentation and health-related grounds are assessed under the general rules, and an applicant with a complication in any of those areas should get that assessed before considering a program whose principal cost is a payment. The published Gold Card framework is built around a financial transfer of a different character, and the analysis that follows is correspondingly different: what exactly is transferred, to whom, on what terms, what it entitles the payer to, and what happens if the arrangement changes. Build a short chronology from documents, with a date and a source beside each entry: the sponsorship agreement, any filing receipt or notice, the vetting outcome if one was issued, the payment confirmation, and the notice of termination.
The executive order and program materials describe a mechanism in which a gift to the U.S. government is treated as relevant to eligibility under existing immigrant provisions, subject to the determinations the government makes. Identify the single fact most likely to end the case — an old refusal, a criminal matter, a period of unlawful presence, or an unresolved question about identity — and examine it before paying anything.