No. It shows funds at that point, not necessarily how they were lawfully obtained or moved through earlier accounts.
Identify what remains unproved
A St.-Charles investor should distinguish source, path and actual commitment. Review the available authentic evidence and any gap directly; a high balance does not waive nationality, control, risk or enterprise conditions.
The treaty-investor rules ask whether the applicant has placed capital at risk in a commercial sense with the objective of generating a profit, and whether the funds are irrevocably committed. Sixty percent ownership by a Canadian citizen satisfies the treaty-nationality rule and ordinarily shows the ability to develop and direct. Go through every asset on the business's equipment or inventory list and match it to a bill of sale, lease, consignment agreement, or supplier contract that shows who actually holds title and what the investor paid or pledged. The assessment looks at funds actually placed in the U.S. enterprise, substantial relative to its cost, irrevocably committed and subject to partial or total loss if the business fails. A business plan that shows the enterprise breaking even because the owners draw no salary for two years is describing a household subsidised from elsewhere, not an enterprise producing more than a minimal living.